Obviously, Burke’s mourning is not only the death of the French queen, but also the chivalry and aristocratic life in the world where he lives. A set of traditional emotional patterns have vanished. In June 1997, the Japanese master Wang Guowei threw himself into the lake in Yiyuan Kunhu, and Chen Yinque commented on his cultural martyrdom, saying that whenever a cultural value declines, this cultural person will feel pain, which shows that the greater the cultural process, the more painful it will be, which will not only reach a very deep level, but also die for his own peace of mind.

Good things are always relative to a specific reference. In the humanistic world, this specific reference is often in the first person form. Good things are good for us. In the cultural people at the turning point of history, such as Bai Guowei, it is obviously deeper and heavier than the broom.
Everyone has a lot of masks, and my identity will change with the situation. When a female professor in a philosophy school is guilty of having a girlfriend’s meal, the philosopher’s perspective will splash out. When she attends a group of masters’ meeting, the female consciousness may be highlighted. This meeting took place in Paris, France, or in China. I agree that it may have overshadowed the female philosopher. Obviously, in these identities, Professor Zhe is a role that she has earned through hard work the day after tomorrow. One day, she is tired of living in the hospital and can leave this body when she is finished. However, race, yellow race, gender and women will be classified in this way, and they are innately standardized rather than acquired. Such identity is speechless, even if people realize the fact separation, it is still not feasible than Michael Jackson’s mind recognition.
Perhaps the most difficult thing in the identity of Professor China Zhe, a yellow woman, is national identity and national identity, which are acquired between innate norms and acquired. It was once said that I have never seen any Englishman, French or American. I have seen individual individuals. Is this really the case? Said said that orientalism research is famous in the world. He said that European American identity is by no means an empty shelf. When a person meets in the East, he must first be a European or American identity, and then. Of course, this is true for a specific person. A friend of mine in the financial sector goes to China once a month on average. Whenever he meets unruly China people abroad, he hates not being able to find a bucket of state-owned paint to whitewash himself. This sense of shame just reflects his sense of shame that China people can’t get rid of their sense of identity. You will never be ashamed of an Afghan spitting on Fifth Avenue.
Strayer said in the origin of modern countries that the most terrible fate in the modern world is to lose the country. If a person unfortunately becomes a national, then he is nothing. He has no profit, no security, and almost no chance to get meaningful jobs. However, this situation is not a natural fact. For a long time, there was no country, no nation, and no Benedict Anderson famously said that the nation is just an imaginary community, but the problem is that the national identity contains myths. Construction factors Once this imaginary community becomes a reality, it will be difficult for people to deviate from the established track. Mayakovski said, I want my motherland to know me, and I will not be understood. What will happen? Then I have to walk by the motherland like oblique rain. This is easy to say, but who can wave his sleeves without taking away a cloud in the face of his hometown?
Hu Shi felt that China didn’t care about everything. Since he didn’t cut the bone back to his father and cut the meat back to his mother, he recreated a real westernization, while China’s theory of position was the opposite, arguing that all good things are Confucianism and all bad things depend on others’ families. The root of this diametrically opposite position is still torturing me. It’s so complicated.
At present, it is said that the dispute over the China model and the western model is still going on. This theme has lasted for nearly a century. Not long ago, my friend Liu Qing said a special topic. For exploring the development of China, if we must talk about what model is more basic, the real question is what is the good and desirable model, and we still rely on other people’s standards to decide whether it is a kind of intellectual confusion. The interesting thing about this sentence is that it completely negates that I am good, regardless of whether it is inevitable from intellectual logic. If Liu Qing’s statement is a little hasty in terms of action logic.
When a negative event happens than a car rear-end collision, lovers break up, the country disintegrates or the whole culture declines. People always have to find out the cause. Hyde thinks that the parties tend to resort to the situation because of the death of the sky. I have never fought, but I have never observed or the opposition tends to resort to temperament. Is it because of your wrong actions, shirking responsibility, observing and imposing responsibility, or saying it in my identity struggle?
When it comes to observing different actions, Burke has to say that thinkers should be neutral to ministers, but not according to Strauss, which means that ministers’ actions must be partial to myself, which is reasonable. His duty is to be on his own side, and for thinkers to observe, he should not hesitate to be on the side of Excellence, regardless of whether it is discovered in time, that is to say, before the two thinkers choose themselves conditionally.
The question now is what our identity is when comparing me with others, whether it is good or bad, or whether we are both in conflict. Who should we obey? In my opinion, China model advocates have overemphasized the identity of action in my own position and indiscriminately equated myself with superiority. On the other hand, I have completely separated myself from superiority. Associates think of themselves as being able to observe from a specific perspective like an emperor and ignore some good or not, and they will always be reduced to some neutral index data.
Of course, there is a more important question: Do good things have to be me? Do good things have to be me? It is said that it is always good to be at home. In addition to favoritism and justifying shortcomings, it is also because children can’t be exchanged for scolding.
Heidegger said that people are left behind in life, while China, Germany, Americans and Libyans are purely accidental. Then you grow up in such a family atmosphere, such a unified culture and such a value world. Then one day, you have the ability of sexual reflection. You find that everything in the past is not beautiful and you lie, deceive and fool myths. You realize that although the emperor randomly gave you an identity like a dice toss, you can still make a sexual decision about who I am, just like a person in a nightmare. Try to turn yourself over or wake yourself up, but I believe there is always something in intellectual logic. You may think it is not so good, but in action, emotional logic will always be as easy as removing the appendix or tonsil.
Last year, I went to Cardiff, the Welsh capital, and sat by the sunny bay for coffee. My friend complained that there was no beach in this bay, and that Cardiff was very Little Square, full of shabby houses and dull faces, which reminded me that the killer didn’t have a holiday. At first, the young killer complained like this. Finally, he fell in love with the small and shabby city of Brussels.
One culture, one city, one person, one dog, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, one song, and one song.
11 years
It’s okay. immigrate and be a citizen
Not long ago, the fire in Qianhai attracted a saliva war between Zhou Libo and the people. Although the government is responsible for citizens to express these serious topics, it will never prevent Zhou Libo from spitting thick phlegm with his big mouth. The most knotty thing is that this innocent immigrant should be a good citizen.
It is said that self-protection is not terrible, but it is afraid of self-protection culture. Fortunately, Zhou Libo drinks coffee, does not drink ink, spits thick phlegm and does not spit lotus flowers. He happened to read Plato and Critto, and the debate will become slightly more complicated.
Socrates, who is about to face the death penalty in this short dialogue, also refused to emigrate and gave a relatively careful argument. After adulthood, the Athenians realized that the laws governing the political organization of the polis were still dissatisfied and could take their property where they wanted to go, but people still chose to stay in the polis before that, because they believed that they were in fact committed to acting according to the will of the polis, which was a kind of willingness to conclude a contract.
When Zhou Libo said that it’s okay to immigrate and be a good citizen, I guess that’s what he really wanted to say but couldn’t say.
According to this logic, even if you are a poor wage earner who doesn’t know foreign languages and customs, you don’t need to buy soy sauce if you buy salt on a small salary. You still have the choice to leave your country and stay in this country. You have actually silently recognized its laws and policies, so you must be a law-abiding citizen.
This logic seems logical, but let’s take a look at this example before we accept it wholeheartedly.
Suppose you are kidnapped to a ship in your sleep, and when you wake up, there is only that hideous pirate head left in front of you except the Wang Yang sea. Now you two choose 1 to leave the ship and stay in the ship, which of course means drowning. The question is whether it means that you have actually expressed your recognition of the owner’s prestige in the future.
I must send this example back to Hume, a British philosopher. The idea is simple, tight, but irrelevant.
Don’t shout may be because you don’t want to shout. No matter what, it doesn’t mean that you silently recognize this pirate or this degree, but because you were kidnapped by it. On the one hand, you were a big monster, and on the other hand, you were tied to a boat alive, sinking together and falling into the water.
At the end of one year, it was crazy, and it happened in the courtship bridge of Xiamen University debate.
Ask the opponent to argue about your boyfriend? The answer is still not as good as that after two seconds of silence. Well, the default answer is no.
Although my beating heart loves this romantic moment more than I do, I am raising my hands and feet to oppose the boy robber logic.
That’s right, it’s robber logic. Even if the boy loves the name, even if the opposing side doesn’t immediately object to it after an argument, even if a word in the Chinese dictionary is called default method, the boy unilaterally gets the answer that makes the onlookers jump for joy.
Mayakovski once confessed to his motherland like this. I want my motherland to know me. I don’t know. What will happen? Then I have to walk past the motherland like oblique rain. Mayakovski wrote poetically, but in real life full of burdens, who can walk away from his hometown and motherland in this oblique rain?
A person who doesn’t recognize the current political degree of the government will not only give up immigration for various reasons, but also accept that the public interest of the government is better than that of national defense, environmental protection and order protection, etc. Even so, it is still proved by law that he has acquiesced in this government or that most public interests are everywhere like gas, and he can actively accept and refuse to be loyal to the government because of inhaling gas. It is estimated that the company hosting the North Korean tour group will go bankrupt.
Tight wind but not bluffing doesn’t mean that the opposing side has accepted the boy’s courtship, which doesn’t mean that you can be a good citizen. Of course, it doesn’t mean that you have to die. Now the situation is not forced. We may choose this meeting as an alternative among the good people and the mob. There are still many ways to expand the citizens. We can use the law as a shield. The law is an evil law, but the citizens can’t follow the key. We don’t constantly practice a citizen’s righteousness in our daily life, instead of the good people’s mentality in normal life. The mob is out of control and the
Ji Xianlin said that it is patriotic to praise our country, and it is patriotic to be dissatisfied with our country. This is my opinion.
There has never been a savior who has nothing to do with immigration. We can expect that people in different roles will do their own thing. Micro-revolution means that everyone should act and dare to take responsibility, and that the world is better here and now because of what you say and do, even if it is just a little bit better. Then your words and deeds are good, and you are a qualified citizen. This is my opinion.
11 years
Bridges are strong, tunnels are light.
In 1991, Wittgenstein was three years old, and he had been seriously thinking about killing for many years. His doubt was that the fake self was not a genius at all, so it was worthless to live.
Sartre also said that when he was a teenager, everything was necessary now. What is the need for you in this world? What is the significance for others in this world? It is purely accidental that a person is born, grows up and dies in this world. What a sad thing it would be. Sartre said how much I miss people in other places, so they feel indispensable.
Fortunately, Wittgenstein soon ushered in a turn of fortune. In 1911, he came to Cambridge and met Russell, who was already famous all over the world. After observing this manic young man with suspicion for a long time, he finally solemnly declared to him that you are indeed a genius.
Russell’s diagnosis made Wittgenstein feel at ease for the time being, but it also made Russell feel at ease. He made me feel happy and lazy. I feel that I can give him all the difficult thinking departments, and it will be easier for me to give up some technical work by myself.